Johnny Herbert didn’t hold back when addressing Christian Horner’s reaction to Max Verstappen’s penalty at the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix. Herbert, a former F1 driver, criticized Horner for defending Verstappen’s actions on track, calling it a “load of baloney.” His viewpoint caused quite a stir and added fuel to the ongoing debate.

The controversy began when Verstappen received a five-second penalty for leaving the track and gaining an advantage during his battle with Oscar Piastri. While Horner believed the penalty was harsh, Herbert stood firm, stating that those disagreeing with the penalty lack a real understanding of racing. The clash of opinions has sparked significant interest in the racing community.

The Incident Unfolds

During the Saudi Arabian GP, Max Verstappen was penalized for his actions against Oscar Piastri. As the two battled for the lead, Verstappen moved off track, re-entering ahead of Piastri. The FIA stewards judged this maneuver as gaining an unfair advantage, resulting in a five-second penalty for Verstappen. Despite serving this penalty during his sole pit stop, Verstappen finished second, left in the aftermath of a controversial call.

Horner’s Standpoint

Christian Horner, Red Bull’s team principal, was clearly displeased with the penalty decision. Armed with a screenshot from Verstappen’s on-board camera, Horner attempted to prove that Verstappen was leading at the apex of the corner. Horner’s defense, however, was met with skepticism from many in the paddock, including Johnny Herbert.

Herbert’s Critique

Herbert stated, “Most drivers know when they should give a place back. The apex. That’s where Verstappen wasn’t, at least two meters away. Horner’s argument seemed like passing the buck to the FIA, which, in Herbert’s view, was wrong and poor sportsmanship.”

Red Bull’s Dilemma

Horner mentioned, “I think the stewards think it was a slam dunk. So, to protest it could lead to nothing. We’ll ask them to review footage not initially available, but this may not alter the outcome.”

Calls for Rule Review

Horner expressed, “Looking at it, it’s hard to see their reasoning. Same speed, both cars head into that corner, and Oscar runs deep. Max can’t vanish just like that. Why can’t they let them race, especially on lap one?”

F1 Paddock Reactions

Drivers pointed out, “It needs consistency. The rules should be clear so everyone knows what’s acceptable. If those change, they must communicate changes to ensure no ambiguity.”

Herbert’s Experience Speaks Volumes

“I’ve been in an F1 car; reality demands recognizing when you’re out of line,” Herbert emphasized. “The penalty was fair because rules weren’t respected. That’s racing.”

Looking Forward

For Red Bull, moving forward is crucial. They need to channel their energy into racing strategies and ensure drivers are briefed about what’s allowed and what isn’t on track. It’s a learning curve.

Verstappen’s Perspective

Verstappen maintains, “That call can change races. We must learn from these and adapt. It’s about what’s next and staying focused on driving.”

The Road Ahead

The buzz around the penalty keeps conversations alive, ensuring that every decision and every race contribute to the sport’s legacy. The road ahead promises more high-speed drama and excitement.


In the world of F1, racing dynamics often spark heated debates. Herbert and Horner’s exchange over Verstappen’s penalty underscores the tension between competition and regulation. It’s clear that while rules are necessary, their interpretation can vary, leaving room for passionate exchanges that continue to define the thrill of racing.

Related Posts